<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office 2007</title>
	<link>http://thoughtnot.net/2007/03/26/microsoft-office-2007/</link>
	<description>because I thought so...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://thoughtnot.net/2007/03/26/microsoft-office-2007/#comment-122</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thoughtnot.net/2007/03/26/microsoft-office-2007/#comment-122</guid>
					<description>Your .pst file is 900Mb!? Holy cow… no wonder your Outlook was so slow! Mine is only 43.6MB… of course, I just archived, but my arhive is only around 100Mb. You need to archive and compress that bad boy!

Glad I could help. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your .pst file is 900Mb!? Holy cow… no wonder your Outlook was so slow! Mine is only 43.6MB… of course, I just archived, but my arhive is only around 100Mb. You need to archive and compress that bad boy!</p>
<p>Glad I could help. =)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick</title>
		<link>http://thoughtnot.net/2007/03/26/microsoft-office-2007/#comment-120</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thoughtnot.net/2007/03/26/microsoft-office-2007/#comment-120</guid>
					<description>My .pst file is about 900mb as I am a digital pack rat.  I ran the repair and you are right it make a huge difference.  It found so many errors I couldn't count them all and I didn't see a summary in the log.

Overall, without archiving which I will probably do, it runs much faster. 

Good finds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My .pst file is about 900mb as I am a digital pack rat.  I ran the repair and you are right it make a huge difference.  It found so many errors I couldn&#8217;t count them all and I didn&#8217;t see a summary in the log.</p>
<p>Overall, without archiving which I will probably do, it runs much faster. </p>
<p>Good finds!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

